Colourful Solutions > The periodic table: Classification of elements > Discontinuity in 1st ionization energies

Trends in first ionization energies across the periodic table do not show an even progression; there are obvious discontinuities. These are evidence for the existence of sub-shells.

Syllabus reference S3.1.7

Structure 3.1.7 - Discontinuities occur in the trend of increasing first ionization energy across a period. (HL)

  • Explain how these discontinuities provide evidence for the existence of energy sublevels.

Guidance

  • Explanations should be based on the energy of the electron removed, rather than on the “special stability” of filled and half-filled sub-levels.

Tools and links


1st ionisation energies of successive elements

The first ionisation energy of an element is defined as the energy required to remove 1 mole of electrons from one mole of gaseous atoms under standard conditions.

M(g) M+(g) + 1e

A graph of first ionisation energy against atomic number shows how the first ionisation energy varies moving from element to element in the periodic table. The outermost electron is being removed in each case and so the amount of energy needed to remove it is a function of the force holding the electron in position around the atom.

This force is dependent on two main factors and is 'fine-tuned' by a third factor.

  1. 1 The charge on the nucleus
  2. 2 The distance of the outer electron from the nucleus
  3. 3 Inter-electron repulsions

As the charge on the nucleus increases so the energy required to remove the electron increases. As the distance between the outermost electron and the nucleus increases so the energy required to remove it decreases.

Anomalies in 1st ionisation energy across a period

On inspection of the graph we see that there are inflexions moving across a period that seem to be contrary to the effect of increasing nuclear charge.

Moving from beryllium to boron there is a decrease in 1st ionisation energy. This can be explained as being due to the location of boron's outer electron in a 'p' orbital, which is of slightly higher energy (further from the nucleus on average).

Hence, less energy is required to remove the 2px electron from boron than the 2s electron from beryllium.

There is another inflexion from nitrogen to oxygen that must also be explained.

It appears that the energetic effect of pairing up two electrons in a 'p' orbital increases the energy of that orbital (or at least, the electrons in that orbital), meaning that less energy than expected is required to ionise one of them.

Both of these apparently anomalous inflexions also repeat across the third period, from magnesium to aluminium and from phosphorus to sulfur, with the same explanations.

Hover and click on the plots for more information.

^ top


^ top